Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of international cricket centuries at Warner Park


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. No prejudice to merging, which can be attempted/discussed through normal channels. postdlf (talk) 00:19, 6 July 2017 (UTC)

List of international cricket centuries at Warner Park

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

A list for a particular cricket grounds is over-specialization. I see we have others. I don't thing they make any sense either. A list by team, that would make much more sense  DGG ( talk ) 08:36, 6 June 2017 (UTC)  DGG ( talk ) 08:36, 6 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Your point is wrong. Citing the main international stats for a particular cricket ground is very precious. If you think it is no point, so according to your view, citing centuries for cricketers is also not worth. So delete all the centuries cited in each players' article. Providing centuries of each venue is worth just like a player scores a century to his career. Also, it is about international matches and international centuries. I don't think any bad about the articles. So keep them and edit in future. Gihan Jayaweera''' (talk) 02:21, 6 June 2017 (UTC)


 * Weak Keep. Cricket statistics for particular grounds ("fastest century at X", "lowest score by Y at Z") are kept in the same way as they are for teams, due I presume to historical quirks in the different grounds, which would argue for notability to me. Whether it's an entirely encyclopedic subject I can't be sure, so I'm happy to be convinced in either direction over the course of the AfD. BigHaz - Schreit mich an 10:17, 6 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 10:42, 6 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Cricket-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 10:42, 6 June 2017 (UTC)


 * Comment It could be merged to Warner Park Sporting Complex; that's not true of some lists of centuries for other more frequently used grounds, for what it's worth. Afraid I'm not sure if it's encyclopedic either. --Colapeninsula (talk) 11:08, 6 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep. I know 'other stuff exists' isn't usually an argument against deletion.  However in this case it might be. There are umpteen lists of this nature, covering every international cricket ground I can think of (and lots I didn't think of). Many of these lists are long-standing. This suggests to me that there's a consensus that lists of this kind are appropriate for the encyclopaedia. Neiltonks (talk) 12:27, 6 June 2017 (UTC)
 * I have not been able to find a similar AfD discussion related to international cricket centuries at a particular ground. Find one if you can. OTHERSTUFFEXISTS may not apply in this case. There are other articles too such as List of international cricket centuries at Lord's. Ajf773 (talk) 18:21, 6 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Caribbean-related deletion discussions. North America1000 13:48, 6 June 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Merge I can see a lot of space on main article and we can keep this article on the main until it becomes large enough to separate.  Greenbörg  (talk)  09:36, 7 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete. While there is no precedent for these "List of centuries at x" articles, I propose delete based on WP:NOTMIRROR as this content can be uplifted from the ESPNCricinfo website. Ajf773 (talk) 18:21, 13 June 2017 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  So Why  07:44, 14 June 2017 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ad Orientem (talk) 01:58, 22 June 2017 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: The last relist has not really made consensus much clearer so I'm relisting this a third time. Consensus seems to be slightly in favor of keeping this in one form or another but further discussion is needed.
 * Tend towards delete on the grounds of WP:NOTMIRROR, because I don't believe that a list of every century scored in international cricket is notable in an encyclopaedia, and because, in general, the content could be more usefully summarised at the article about the ground. Summarised rather than copied. Unlike the article creator I don't believe, either, that it is always appropriate to add tables of centuries etc... to articles about players - I would much rather see sensible prose summaries in the majority of cases. I could be convinced otherwise if someone can show definitive notability of a list of all scores of greater than 100 (and, by extension, five wicket hauls etc...). Blue Square Thing (talk) 07:22, 22 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Merge into Warner Park Sporting Complex. Definitely NOT delete because the info is useful but probably in the wrong place. Jack &#124; talk page 07:39, 22 June 2017 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  So Why  19:28, 30 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete -- an unnecessary cross-categorisation and an indiscriminate collection of information, which Wikipedia is WP:NOT. K.e.coffman (talk) 03:23, 3 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Merge to the main article about the ground. Does not justify a separate article. Johnlp (talk) 22:39, 3 July 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.