Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of international cricket centuries by Dinesh Chandimal


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Dinesh Chandimal. Anyone who wishes to rescue the content from behind the redirect, and merge into the main article, is welcome to do so at their convenience. Daniel (talk) 03:08, 20 January 2021 (UTC)

List of international cricket centuries by Dinesh Chandimal

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Fails WP:NLIST. Störm  (talk)  21:59, 8 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone  23:13, 8 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Cricket-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone  23:13, 8 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sri Lanka-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone  23:13, 8 January 2021 (UTC)


 * Merge to Dinesh Chandimal. Azuredivay (talk) 05:00, 9 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete per other outcomes of 'List of international cricket centuries..' articles. WP:NOTSTATS. Ajf773 (talk) 09:14, 9 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep or Merge Have you never heard of WP:MULTIAFD or are you deliberately being disruptive? My keep reasons are on one of the other related AfDs that this should have been bundled with. Spike &#39;em (talk) 10:30, 9 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Please read WP:NLIST first and then re-comment. Policies change with time, based on the consensus, so articles/lists should reflect that. You should link your reasoning as your rationale doesn't make sense. Closing admin should ignore such comments. Störm   (talk)  13:07, 9 January 2021 (UTC)
 * To expand the quote from the referenced WP:NLIST :One accepted reason why a list topic is considered notable is if it has been discussed as a group or set by independent reliable sources and There is no present consensus for how to assess the notability of more complex and cross-categorization lists (such as "Lists of X of Y") or what other criteria may justify the notability of stand-alone lists. There is clearly no consensus that the only notability criteria for a standalone list is that is has been discussed as a group. There is also the guidance in WP:NOTSTATS that : Where statistics are so lengthy as to impede the readability of the article, the statistics can be split into a separate article and summarized in the main article. The closing admin should ignore selectively quoted guidelines. Spike &#39;em (talk) 14:57, 10 January 2021 (UTC)
 * WP:NOTSTATS is a general guideline that applies to all articles with statistics. It is not limited to lists and in your quoted text it even doesn't mention that it applies to the list. Störm   (talk)  11:28, 11 January 2021 (UTC)


 * Merge. Following earlier AFDs here and here, there is nothing to warrant a separate article, per WP:SPLIT. Per nom, these articles do not stand on their own. wjematherplease leave a message... 12:20, 9 January 2021 (UTC)
 * But these earlier AFDs Articles for deletion/List of international cricket centuries by Mushfiqur Rahim or Articles for deletion/List of international cricket centuries by Upul Tharanga or Articles for deletion/List of international cricket centuries by Shakib Al Hasan resulted in being deleted. There is nothing to warrant a separate article, NOR is there any justifiable reason why such indiscriminate information needs to appear on the players' BLP articles. Ajf773 (talk) 09:27, 14 January 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete per other similar lists. Just indiscriminate stats, available on stats sites elsewhere. Nigej (talk) 16:16, 14 January 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.