Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of international cricket five-wicket hauls at BRSABV Ekana Cricket Stadium


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Vanamonde (Talk) 15:48, 17 March 2023 (UTC)

List of international cricket five-wicket hauls at BRSABV Ekana Cricket Stadium

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

There have only ever been 3 centuries at this ground, which is not enough to warrant a separate list for these. Doesn't meet any of the suggested notability requirements of WP:NLIST. Joseph2302 (talk) 09:35, 9 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sports, Cricket, Lists,  and India. Joseph2302 (talk) 09:35, 9 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Uttar Pradesh-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 09:49, 9 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Comment - revert the parent article back to this then delete or redirect this unnecessary fork Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 09:53, 9 March 2023 (UTC)
 * In the previous set of five-wicket haul AfD's the general consensus was, iirc, that under 15 or 25 or so shouldn't merit a standalone article. There was a quite long discussion about this at the time and I think that was what we arrived at. I imagine the best thing to do here might be to partial merge into the ground article, but with the Econom and Batsmen columns removed - again, this was in the general consensus at the time - and possibly without any of the tables but with a suitable paragraph of prose instead. I could live with redirect - which would at least stop the article being re-created quite as easily - or deletion, but my memory is that the consensus ended up being redirect. Blue Square Thing (talk) 06:41, 10 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete. Nowhere near enough occurrences to justify a list, and too few to really be worth copying across to the stadium article. StickyWicket (talk) 18:13, 10 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete, insignificant stats. Ajf773 (talk) 20:39, 12 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete, unnecessary fork, fragmenting content, fails NLIST.  // Timothy :: talk  10:35, 17 March 2023 (UTC)
 * I boldly restored the content to the parent as Spiderone suggested. I think this is a very unlikely search term, but if others feel a redirect is helpful I have no objection.  // Timothy :: talk  10:44, 17 March 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.