Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of international cricket five-wicket hauls at Punjab Cricket Association IS Bindra Stadium


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Withdrawn by the nominator. (non-admin closure)  M h hossein   talk 03:39, 21 February 2019 (UTC)

List of international cricket five-wicket hauls at Punjab Cricket Association IS Bindra Stadium

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This is classical WP:NOTSTATS and WP:LISTCRUFT. Four numbers not enough. Other sports should have stuff like this also, like intenational soccer goals in stadiums. THE NEW  Immortal  Wizard  (chat) 19:39, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Cricket-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 22:45, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 22:45, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 22:45, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 02:34, 18 February 2019 (UTC)


 * Complete the list or redirect if no-one's willing to do that. I could 15 Test and 2 ODI five wicket hauls at this stadium in a reasonable number of matches. The list shows three of these. The numbers are reasonable for a standalone list, but only if someone's willing to actually complete it. Blue Square Thing (talk) 09:25, 18 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep and complete - I'll complete this list now. Absolutely ludicrous to suggest that this is listcruft when other such articles exist. 10 items is usually the threshold for a content fork to legitimately exist and this one meets that requirement, they just haven't bothered to fill in the table. – PeeJay 19:35, 18 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Withdrawn by nominator - Thanks to for completing the list. The issue is solved. THE NEW  Immortal  Wizard  (chat)  17:56, 19 February 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.