Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of international cricket five-wicket hauls at the Riverside Ground


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. -- Patar knight - chat/contributions 22:32, 24 January 2019 (UTC)

List of international cricket five-wicket hauls at the Riverside Ground

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

According to Articles for deletion/List of international cricket five-wicket hauls at M. A. Aziz Stadium this must be removed.  Immortal  Wizard  (chat) 19:17, 17 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Articles for deletion/Log/2019 January 17.  —cyberbot I   Talk to my owner :Online 19:30, 17 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Cricket-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 19:39, 17 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 19:39, 17 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:23, 17 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:23, 17 January 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete as per the nomination and outcome of the similar AfD mentioned. This is WP:NOTSTATS. There is also an entire category of similar articles that may need to be addressed: Category:Lists of international cricket five-wicket hauls by ground. Ajf773 (talk) 21:22, 17 January 2019 (UTC)
 * I am utterly confused. Here and in various other places you seem to be arguing that lists of fifers are notable and should not be deleted.  So why have you nominated this one for deletion.....? -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 21:39, 17 January 2019 (UTC)
 * for now, it should be deleted. It is unfair to keep some of them while deleting others. A clear concensus should be made in WikiProject Cricket for consistent guidelines and to avoid further dilemmas.  Immortal  Wizard  (chat) 21:44, 17 January 2019 (UTC)
 * We either keep all or delete all, or have something in the middle like n number of fifers per ground.  Immortal  Wizard  (chat) 21:47, 17 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Not to mention, creators' work should not be overlooked. All of them should get fair treatment.  Immortal  Wizard  (chat) 21:49, 17 January 2019 (UTC)
 * See WP:ALLORNOTHING.  Lugnuts  Fire Walk with Me 09:13, 18 January 2019 (UTC)
 * ' I think it's best to do WP:MULTIAFD.  Immortal  Wizard  (chat) 21:56, 17 January 2019 (UTC)


 * Note - this nomination strikes me as curious given the comments the nominator made at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Cricket and messages they left on various user talk pages. They've also created three articles on exactly the same theme in the last 24 hours. It's not a great leap of imagination to arrive at a conclusion that they picked a featured list to AfD to prove some kind of point. Blue Square Thing (talk) 22:09, 17 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep This seems to be a WP:POINTY nomination, after the nom re-created this article, which had already been deleted via AfD. There is no valid reason in the deletion rationale of this nomination, and further more, the article in question is a Featured List.  Lugnuts  Fire Walk with Me 09:08, 18 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Also note that has contested the deletion on the talkpage of the M. A. Aziz Stadium article, after being missing on WP for the best part of TWO YEARS. What are the chances of this editor coming out of retirement to save this very niche article?  Lugnuts  Fire Walk with Me 09:13, 18 January 2019 (UTC)


 * So are you trying to say I am using sock puppets? And you have no right to call that niche considering there are dozens of articles like this (some FA). The only difference is that it has a underdeveloped lead unlike most of them, which, with enough time given, could be made better. After all, my main purpose of creating it in the first place was to have FA list. I felt that it had the potential since other ones have been as well. Otherwise, you have valid points and I would suggest MULTIAFD.  Immortal  Wizard  (chat) 15:51, 18 January 2019 (UTC)
 * No, I'm just pointing out this amazing coincidence.  Lugnuts  Fire Walk with Me 15:54, 18 January 2019 (UTC)


 * Keep - no valid deletion nomination given. "One article of this type was deleted therefore they must all go" is a completely invalid argument.  Discussion should take place at an appropriate location as to whether all/only some/none of these articles are valid for WP before any further half-cocked AfDs are started.... -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 09:42, 18 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Note - over 100 such articles have been bundled for deletion by the same nominator at Articles for deletion/List of international cricket five-wicket hauls at Basin Reserve. The list of bundled articles include this one... Blue Square Thing (talk) 18:55, 18 January 2019 (UTC)
 * I had to do this. Hopefully everything will be resolved :)  Immortal  Wizard  (chat) 19:00, 18 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep I am coming to this AfD from WP:CRICKET. I don't consider this as a violation of WP:NOTSTAT, I consider this article a logical and acceptable WP:SPINOFF based on Content_forking The stadium article should contain a paragraph summarizing these lists and should have a link to the article about 5 wicket hauls. The readers of the stadium article would most likely also be interested in reading these records. I also note it is FL. (I also agree with what User:ChrisTheDude said above. -- D Big X ray ᗙ  22:50, 21 January 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.