Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of interstellar comets


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Interstellar object. (non-admin closure) Sulfurboy (talk) 18:56, 10 May 2020 (UTC)

List of interstellar comets

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

There is only one interstellar comet to date. Including ʻOumuamua is OR. So the list includes just one entry. Useless. Delete per WP:TOOSOON as it could be recreated when another interstellar comet arrives MistyGraceWhite (talk) 15:40, 3 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 16:24, 3 May 2020 (UTC)


 * REDIRECT Interstellar_object since there are only two confirmed objects.  D r e a m Focus  18:10, 3 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Redirect as above. This seems a little optimistic :) The list is in essence the two sub-headings of Interstellar_object. The time may never come for a separate list to be necessary, and it definitely isn't right now. -- Elmidae (talk · contribs) 22:53, 3 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Interstellar object. There is no reason to have a list article consisting of two entries. What more is there to say? Devonian Wombat (talk) 04:07, 4 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Astronomy-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 22:58, 8 May 2020 (UTC)


 * Redirect per above. Something with only 2 entries doesn't need a list. CrazyBoy826 (talk) 17:22, 9 May 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.