Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of inventions shown on American Inventor (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was move. Note that during moving the article, someone managed to remove the AFD header from the article, which is not a good thing to do, and would technically invalidate this AFD. Neil  ム  11:19, 30 August 2007 (UTC)

List of inventions shown on American Inventor

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Most of the inventions in the article are not notable. The article needs to be moved to List of finalists on American Inventor, and list the 16 total who got to spend 50,000 dollars in season 1 and 2. Codelyoko193 TalkEditor Review 19:35, 20 August 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete As I said when I first nominated the page for AFD, lumping together a bunch of non-notable things does not make them add up to something notable. - TexasAndroid 15:55, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment - If you are recommending a move you might want to take a look at WP:RM. -- Tλε Rαnδom Eδιτor  ( tαlk ) 19:42, 21 August 2007 (UTC)


 * Move per nom. Slartibartfast ( 19 92 ) 20:14, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep Good news, Codelyoko. The article has now been renamed List of finalists on American Inventor.  As to your suggestion that the author now cut it down to fit your personal preference, do it yourself.  Mandsford 22:50, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete This content is more appropriate for a fan site, rather than an encyclopedia.  There is no notability for these "inventions" Corpx 03:29, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Merge. I have a really novel suggestion. Merge it with American Inventor. If the show survives several more seasons, the finalists can be moved to a sub page, but for now, the main AI article is not huge. - Crockspot 23:58, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
 * MergeThe final four are already on that page, the only thing here is a tad more info and the final 12 finalists, which I'm not sure are particularly important. i said 00:05, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Both Mansford's suggestion to keep and the above two suggestions to merge look pretty reasonable. --  Le Grand Roi des Citrouilles  Tally-ho! 01:03, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.