Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of kyokushin techniques


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   merge to Kyokushin kaikan. (non-admin closure) Logan Talk Contributions 06:56, 17 January 2011 (UTC)

List of kyokushin techniques

 * – ( View AfD View log )

This is an un encyclopaedic list of martial arts techniques without verfication why they are notable. Dwanyewest (talk) 04:08, 9 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions.  -- Acather96 (talk) 09:50, 9 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions.  -- Acather96 (talk) 09:50, 9 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Korea-related deletion discussions.  -- Acather96 (talk) 09:50, 9 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions.  — Janggeom (talk) 02:55, 10 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Merge Keep Karate techniques are source-able. I suggest to the creator of this AFD that they implement the suggestions from the first Shito-ryu AFD: merge List of kyokushin techniques and List of Shito-ryu techniques to a general Karate techniques article. The general article is much easier to source than these style-specific articles. jmcw (talk) 10:32, 10 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Comment I have created Karate techniques and will merge this material. jmcw (talk) 10:26, 14 January 2011 (UTC)


 * Merge into Kyokushin kaikan. My reasoning is explained at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Martial arts. The list does need to be sourced, however. Astudent0 (talk) 14:26, 10 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Comment Either of the two previous suggestions makes sense to me--either create an article on karate techniques or merge the techniques list into the article on the specific style. I don't support keeping the list as a separate article. Papaursa (talk) 03:21, 13 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Merge, following Papaursa's comments. Janggeom (talk) 14:00, 13 January 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.