Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of lists of lists (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy keep 1 as nomination withdrawn "and no one other than the nominator recommends that the page be deleted." (non-admin closure) KTC (talk) 00:07, 18 June 2012 (UTC)

List of lists of lists
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

Original research, no independent sources, no useful relevance Night of the Big Wind  talk  14:37, 17 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep per consensus reasoning in the first AfD, two months ago. A legitimate navigational aid and no reason to get rid of it. --Arxiloxos (talk) 15:20, 17 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep per ArxiloxosSeasider91 (talk) 15:23, 17 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep per previous AfD, q.v. --Seduisant (talk) 15:43, 17 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Huh, where is that other AfD coming from? No mention of that on the talkpage. Night of the Big Wind  talk  15:55, 17 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Look at the first link in the "AfDs for this article" box just above. --Seduisant (talk) 16:08, 17 June 2012 (UTC)


 * Keep - This is a user-navigational index page, not an encyclopedic topic. The fact that Mr. Hammer, a serious deletionist at AfD, withdrew his nomination the first time around, acknowledging the page's utility, should have been taken into consideration by the nominator. The title is whimsical, but descriptive. Carrite (talk) 17:35, 17 June 2012 (UTC)
 * I did look on the talkpage for an earlier AfD, but there was mention of it. So I assumed I was the first to nominate it. It seems the closing of the first AfD was handled incorrectly :-( Night of the Big Wind  talk  18:51, 17 June 2012 (UTC)


 * Request speedy close as keep as nominator. No article but navigation. Night of the Big Wind  talk  18:51, 17 June 2012 (UTC) Out of principal I don't close AfD's I have started
 * Keep valuable, useful, interesting, clever. Which may not be valid keep arguments but keep anyway.-- SPhilbrick (Talk)  21:52, 17 June 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.