Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of lists of lists (4th nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep per WP:SNOW. It's obvious that this list isn't going anywhere anytime soon. (non-admin closure) Tavix | Talk  21:21, 8 June 2015 (UTC)

List of lists of lists
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Page is a collection of content that is only related by being a list of lists. This page also has no real context outside of Wikipedia, making it better suited for a category or Wikipedia namespace page. It seems the only purpose of this page is to be recursive, not truly informative Archanine (talk) 23:00, 7 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Snowball Keep. Just look thru the past nominations. Useful navigation tool. It was endlessly argued that categories do not replace lists. And with this page so big hardly anyone notices it is recursive, so even if it is a joke, it is mostly lost. Staszek Lem (talk)
 * Keep - it's been argued to death —Мандичка YO 😜 00:25, 8 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep: Yes, it's one of the oddities of the site, but I still say that it shouldn't be allowed until it includes itself, in full. Hithladaeus (talk) 00:51, 8 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep: Per Wikimandia. --Seduisant (talk) 03:42, 8 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep: one of the exceptions to the rules here. — Lentower (talk) 05:45, 8 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep per WP:CLN.  Lugnuts  Dick Laurent is dead 06:45, 8 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:47, 8 June 2015 (UTC)


 * Keep – Qualifies per WP:NOTDUP relative to Category:Lists of lists and as a functional navigational aid per WP:LISTPURP. North America1000 19:28, 8 June 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.