Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of literature about footwear


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. SushiGeek 09:13, 29 April 2006 (UTC)

List of literature about footwear
Originally prodded and removed. Unencyclopedic list of books. Wikipedia is not a bibliography. Eusebeus 14:14, 23 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, wrongly deprodded by chronic de-prodder Kappa. Kuzaar 15:04, 23 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Query How do you "wrongly deprod" something? Anyone can deprod anything for any reason. Kotepho 19:00, 23 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Deprodding without fixing any of the glaring errors on a page seems a mite counterproductive. delete as shoecruft Appropriate Username 21:38, 23 April 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete, listcruft, shoecruft. Tokakeke 17:58, 23 April 2006 (UTC)
 * I assume there must be an article on footwear or shoes, why not merge it there? Jcuk 21:16, 23 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Merge- to shoes. DVD+ R/W 21:18, 23 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Merge or delete -- Hirudo 02:20, 24 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Merge or delete --MaNeMeBasat 04:55, 24 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. listcruft. --Icarus 06:49, 24 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. If one of these books is the book on shoes, revered by all shoe experts worldwide, then merge that book. Please don't make shoe an indiscriminate collection of books that mention shoes. Weregerbil 12:34, 24 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, not merge. This list is unencyclopaedic and may constitute listcruft. Stifle (talk) 16:34, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Merge to shoe as a further reading list. This will be useful, especially considering that the article currently has no references at all -- it helps to point readers to other useful works. Christopher Parham (talk) 22:20, 28 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Purely unencyclopedic listcruft. Beno1000 23:52, 28 April 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.