Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of loanwords in Assyrian Neo-Aramaic


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. ✗ plicit  00:49, 20 April 2024 (UTC)

List of loanwords in Assyrian Neo-Aramaic

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Ehrmagerd, werds! As interesting as I find this, Wikipedia is not a dictionary. Pepper Beast   (talk)  12:35, 6 April 2024 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 06:35, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Language and Lists.   Pepper Beast    (talk)  12:35, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Middle East-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 12:43, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep: the introduction is clearly not a dictionary. the list defines some words but is mostly serving the functions of a list. should be fine enough as is to keep that too User:Sawerchessread (talk) 16:41, 13 April 2024 (UTC)


 * Keep: Wikipedia is not a dictionary, and this article is not a dictionary entry. I don't know what gave the nom the idea that articles about linguistics and etymology are somehow not encyclopedic, prompting them to launch their current "Ehrmagerd, werds!" deletion campaign. Owen&times; &#9742;  14:55, 14 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Keep: Does not read like a dictionary entry, it is a list – and a quality one at that. ~ Dictionary (talk) 15:00, 14 April 2024 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.