Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of locations in Jak and Daxter


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Cirt (talk) 02:32, 4 October 2008 (UTC)

List of locations in Jak and Daxter

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

This is a completely unnecessary list of minor plot points and in-game levels that have no context outside of the plot of the series. Anything important to the overall plot should be covered within its relevant game, while the rest does not deserve any mention. TTN (talk) 18:22, 29 September 2008 (UTC)
 * I am also nominating the following page because it is just an unnecessary list of locations and plot summary:

DeleteWP:N, WP:FICT, gameguide, WP:V, WP:OR. etc, kthnx. bridies (talk) 19:17, 29 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game related deletions. TTN (talk) 18:28, 29 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete or if someone wants to be GFDL-compliant, redirect to Jak & Daxter (series). Pie is good   (Apple is the best)  20:11, 29 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete both for a lack of reliable third-party sources, thus violating WP:N and WP:V. Probably a violation of WP:VGSCOPE and WP:NOT too, since this article is an attempt to document every level in a game, rather than engage in a concise summary. Randomran (talk) 21:22, 29 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Merge whatever content is worth merging to Jak & Daxter (series) (which, really, is not much, but at least something like Haven City (which is across 3 games) should have a mention.) --M ASEM 21:31, 29 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete both — Wikipedia is not a publisher of original thought. There exist absolutely no sources backing anything, which further reinforces WP:NOT. MuZemike  ( talk ) 00:03, 30 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep the list of locations as the preferred way to deal with this sort of content. Merge the individual location. into it. DGG (talk) 05:01, 30 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete – no assertion of notability through sources independent of the topic. Entire list is excessive plot summary, and not appropriate per WP:VGSCOPE. — sephiroth bcr  ( converse ) 21:17, 30 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete — Plot rehashing, no notability, unreferenced. Mr. Absurd (talk) 03:58, 1 October 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.