Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of magic clubs


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was Delete (will note that I put the two that were in this list in a "magic clubs" category) Ryan Norton T 02:00, 22 October 2005 (UTC)

List of magic clubs
Pointless list. Not notable/worthy of a list. Incomplete and very unlikely that list could grow into anything useful. Also, Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information. Krash 03:02, 14 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep, wikipedia users should be able to find examples of notable magic clubs. Kappa 04:20, 14 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Indeed they should. And that's why there is Google. Lists that I've encountered here on Wikipedia have corresponding articles. There is no Magic club article. And, to me, it seems this list was created as a link farm for Magic Club of Vienna, itself a dubious article. I'm not opposed to Category:Magic clubs, but I don't think anything less than about 10 entries is worthy of a list. And this isn't a topic that's going to have that kind of growth very quickly. -- Krash 13:21, 14 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Google is not an excuse for wikipedia not to organize itself properly. Kappa 18:48, 14 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete but not reason not to have a Magic Clubs subcategory of Magic. The Land 09:14, 14 October 2005 (UTC)
 * So you don't think people should know what country the Magic Circle is based in before they click on the link? Kappa 11:37, 14 October 2005 (UTC)
 * So you cannot add the country to the magic article but you can put it in this one? - Andre Engels 13:16, 14 October 2005 (UTC)
 * I oppose making this a category, which would not not show this information, I have no objection to merging, which would retain it. Kappa 18:51, 14 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Merge or delete. A list of two can be moved into magic (illusion) or in some other article where it fits. - Andre Engels 13:16, 14 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Merge content into magic (illusion) article per Andre Engels. Will probably get more views of the information there.--Isotope23 13:49, 14 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep, useful list. Trollderella 16:14, 14 October 2005 (UTC)


 * Delete A list of two items is not a list. This is why categories were invented. Denni &#9775; 02:59, 15 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Useless. Gamaliel 18:23, 15 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Categorize and delete. -Sean Curtin 07:02, 16 October 2005 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.