Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of main teachers from My Gym Partner's a Monkey


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete all. — TKD::Talk 10:40, 29 August 2007 (UTC)

List of main teachers from My Gym Partner's a Monkey
AfDs for this article: 
 * – (View AfD) (View log)

This is a spun-off duplicate of parts of List_of_characters_from_My_Gym_Partner%27s_a_Monkey (without pictures), and therefore should be deleted. There is no real reason to spin off a character list multiple times when it can be reorganized on the main page. MSJapan 05:32, 24 August 2007 (UTC)

Additional noms for same reason:


 * List of main characters from My Gym Partner's a Monkey
 * List of secondary characters from My Gym Partner's a Monkey


 * Delete all. The pages have a lot of non-free images without fair use rationale too. Dbromage  [Talk]  06:38, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete all. For what it's worth, this particular series has been a little bit troublesome. For starters, these forks have been created in the past, and have gone thru AFD, and then speedy. Secondly, List of characters from My Gym Partner's a Monkey is under semi-protect for a particular reason, and these forks will circumvent those reasons. See that page edit history. Yngvarr 11:39, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete all. The sections are too small to justify the pageforks and would circumvent the semi-protect on the main article as cited above. -- treelo talk 12:12, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete or Redirect - This article appears slightly unprofessional for Wikipedia. Perhaps it could merge into the show's main character list? TheInfinityZero 15:51, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Strong delete - This article is redundant, and has no reason to exist. The editor who created it has a history of this. They find that their edits are always reverted or deleted for many reasons, so they create these fork pages to try and fly under the radar. These forks can gain quite a following if allowed to remain, and can become cesspools of cruft and misinformation. This is an attempt to escape the scrutiny of the editing community. -- Elaich   talk 13:48, 28 August 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.