Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of major highway bridges and tunnels of South Hampton Roads region of Virginia


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was  d elete. - Mailer Diablo 07:08, 3 November 2007 (UTC)

List of major highway bridges and tunnels of South Hampton Roads region of Virginia

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

I don't see the point of this. Satori Son doesn't either, but for some unknown reason he removed the WP:PROD template. NE2 19:32, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Weak keep for now. Like it or not, this a list of apparently notable bridges and tunnels in a certain area. I would review the various articles listed and see if some of those need to be deleted; I suspect they do. If the list became a lot shorter, then I would say delete. Beware: transportcruft can be hard to get rid of! Brianyoumans 21:39, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
 * The issue is that we don't need a list of bridges like this. The articles on the region, the rivers, and the cities should list them; this is a list that nobody would think to go to. --NE2 22:53, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per comment above. JJL 23:24, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete It is simply unnecessary to list highways out. Chris!  c t 00:57, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per NE2  master son T - C 01:55, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Upmerge to parent categories Category:Bridges in Virginia and Category:Tunnels in Virginia. Hmains 02:39, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:NOT. (And as I'm sure NE2 is quite aware, the "some unknown reason" I removed his/her PROD template was very clearly stated in my edit summary. This didn't have to be personal, and it certainly didn't have to come to AfD.) -- Satori Son 04:25, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
 * You changed the template to read "Wikipedia is not a travel guide or an indiscriminate collection of information; see WP:NOT." A list like this does not only appear in a travel guide, and you should look up "indiscriminate" in the dictionary. When I reverted to the original reason, you removed it because ""what is the point of this?" is not a valid deletion reason". PRODs can be deleted for the sole reason that nobody has objected to their deletion. --NE2 05:43, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
 * So I guess my reason for removing your template was not "some unknown reason" after all. ;) -- Satori Son 05:46, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
 * It's a reason that's completely false. Is that what I should have said? --NE2 06:21, 30 October 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete Already adequately covered at Hampton Roads. --Jayron32| talk | contribs  06:04, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per Jayron32. -- M PD T / C 13:57, 30 October 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.