Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of mayors of Lobos


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. If an editor wants to work on this article in Draft space, contact me or go to WP:REFUND. Otherwise, I think as a draft, this article would just become a CSD G13 in six months. Draftifying is only effective if there is an editor who wants to work on a draft. Liz Read! Talk! 05:07, 30 December 2023 (UTC)

List of mayors of Lobos

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)


 * Delete Seems to fail WP:GNG. The city of Lobos does not seem significant enough to warrant an entire page for its mayors. Tooncool64 (talk) 06:52, 23 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Lists of people and Argentina. CptViraj (talk) 09:05, 23 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions.  Delta  space 42  (talk • contribs) 10:28, 23 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete: while the city of 30,000 certainly has a long history, I can't see this as anything but LISTCRUFT. The fact that none of the mayors listed have their own article here further suggests lack of notability. No point in turning this into a redirect (other than keeping history visible), as this is an unlikely search title. Owen&times; &#9742;  14:33, 23 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Draftify I may be a minority here, but I see lists of mayors as a valid WP:SPINOUT of an article for any municipality. Size of city has no basis in policy (for deletion or to keep an article). Lists of mayors are not indiscriminate and I do not think they are trivial (overcoming WP:LISTCRUFT). I support moving the article to draft space because there are no sources provided in the article. --Enos733 (talk) 17:00, 24 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete or draftify It can't be in mainspace as an unsourced list, it's possibly a valid split if someone wants to save it, but the current article isn't good enough for the reasons previously expressed. SportingFlyer  T · C  02:16, 27 December 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.