Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of members of the Queen's Privy Council for Canada (1968–present)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. (non-admin closure) DavidLeighEllis (talk) 02:01, 29 July 2014 (UTC)

List of members of the Queen's Privy Council for Canada (1968–present)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This list is an amalgamation of existing pages viz


 * List of members of the Queen's Privy Council for Canada (1968–1984)
 * List of members of the Queen's Privy Council for Canada (1984–2003)
 * List of members of the Queen's Privy Council for Canada (2003–present)

i don't see the need for the amalgamated list Gbawden (talk) 13:59, 14 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:30, 15 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:30, 15 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists of people-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:30, 15 July 2014 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, j⚛e deckertalk 00:43, 22 July 2014 (UTC)




 * Keep: I don't see a problem with having an amalgamation of those lists, or any stated reason for deleting.AioftheStorm (talk) 01:49, 22 July 2014 (UTC)


 * Keep - but to be honest, I can't see the value in the three arbitrarily separated lists now that we have the amalgamated one. I'd be okay with keeping the whole list but we can probably consider getting rid of the others unless there is a particular reason for them to be divided that way.  St ★ lwart 1 1 1 01:56, 22 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep - I second Stalwart's comments immediately above: keep the combined list, delete the smaller component lists and replace them with redirects. Wikipedia does not need redundancy; that's why we have redirects.  Dirtlawyer1 (talk) 09:16, 27 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep and redirect the three component lists per Stalwart111 and Dirtlawyer1. Duplicating content is to be avoided, and there's no obvious reason (e.g. per WP:CONSPLIT or WP:SIZESPLIT or for ease of reading) to divide this content between multiple pages. – Arms &amp; Hearts (talk) 19:08, 27 July 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.