Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of members of the Royal Swedish Academy of Agriculture and Forestry


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. joe deckertalk to me 03:03, 6 April 2012 (UTC)

List of members of the Royal Swedish Academy of Agriculture and Forestry

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Unsourced article, almost completely filled with red links, wrong links and links to disambiguation pages. Night of the Big Wind talk  00:53, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists of people-related deletion discussions.  — Frankie (talk) 17:08, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sweden-related deletion discussions.  — Frankie (talk) 17:08, 15 March 2012 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:37, 21 March 2012 (UTC)

 
 * delete pointless having a list with so many red links. surely the Academy lists its members on its website? LibStar (talk) 06:56, 21 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, B  music  ian  03:47, 28 March 2012 (UTC)


 * Comment. Reference added. Although I really don't see the point of this. Perhaps a link to http://www.ksla.se/ledamotsregister/a/ can be added (Current Members) in the "See Also" section of Royal Swedish Academy of Agriculture and Forestry. ~dee  ( talk? ) 15:10, 28 March 2012 (UTC)
 * keep dont really know if list is necessary. But with references added I neitehr see no reason for it to be deleted.--BabbaQ (talk) 22:18, 2 April 2012 (UTC)
 * "dont really know if list is necessary" is a reason for delete. it has only one reference for over 100 entries. as per WP:BURDEN this must article must go. LibStar (talk) 23:48, 2 April 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete per WP:N and WP:LIST. Way too much red, most of these people aren't notable or have no articles. How can the list of them all be notable or useful? Iglooflame (talk) 01:34, 6 April 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.