Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of men's Olympic water polo tournament top sprinters


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Please nominate other articles for deletion separately. ✗ plicit  02:29, 3 June 2021 (UTC)

List of men's Olympic water polo tournament top sprinters

 * – ( View AfD View log )

A very detailed, long list of statistics based on primary sources and databases. The actual topic (who were the top sprinters of tournament X or of team X at the Olympics) doesn't seem to have received significant attention from reliable, independent sources though. Fails WP:LISTN. Fram (talk) 09:45, 20 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Fram (talk) 09:45, 20 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lists of people-related deletion discussions. Fram (talk) 09:45, 20 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. Fram (talk) 09:45, 20 May 2021 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete per nom, and I've added the parallel List of women's Olympic water polo tournament top sprinters. The same user also made List of men's Olympic water polo tournament goalkeepers, National team appearances in the men's Olympic water polo tournament, and several others with really excessively detailed statistics. Compiling statistical and results databases in your own ways is not what Wikipedia is for. Reywas92Talk 18:24, 20 May 2021 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Missvain (talk) 23:32, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete There is detail and then there is too much detail. This is probably one step more than that as the real question is really do we need this. If not then should be deleted as well as the other articles that has mentioned. HawkAussie (talk) 07:24, 28 May 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.