Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of metropolitan areas in Thailand by population


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 15:32, 15 October 2012 (UTC)

List of metropolitan areas in Thailand by population

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

The concepts for all of these "metropolitan areas" / "megalopolis" / "urban agglomerations" are unverified and not supported by any reliable sources. See also Articles for deletion/Greater Hatyai–Songkhla Metropolitan Area. Note that there have been proposals for an act to establish "Maha Nakhon Chiang Mai" as a metropolitan self-administrative area, which is not at all related to what the article describes. Paul_012 (talk) 18:36, 24 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Thailand-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:04, 27 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:04, 27 September 2012 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —Tom Morris (talk) 18:43, 1 October 2012 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 20:26, 8 October 2012 (UTC)


 * There is a reference in the list but it seems to be dead. If it can not be recovered, delete as unsourced. If it can, depends on whether the government has a way to define metropolitan areas.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:30, 9 October 2012 (UTC)
 * The dead link appeared to be only supporting the population figure of the city of Nakhon Ratchasima, and likely contained nothing to support the existence of the claimed agglomeration. --Paul_012 (talk) 07:41, 11 October 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.