Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of microfluidics related companies


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  MBisanz  talk 15:03, 14 April 2016 (UTC)

List of microfluidics related companies

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

WP:NOT DIRECTORY. A few of of these companies are notable major firms with appropriate WP articles, though I doubt they would be notable for the microfluidics work alone; a few smaller ones may even be notable primarily for microfluidics. A few others without an article might be individually notable also. Butthat doesn't mean a list is justified. See also: Articles for deletion/List of microfluidics research groups (3rd nomination)  DGG ( talk ) 02:37, 6 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions.  SwisterTwister   talk  06:15, 6 April 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete as this is another case of having this type of list and it's actually unnecessary, no actual improvements imaginable at all. SwisterTwister   talk  06:16, 6 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete Another case of NOTADIRECTORY. --Randykitty (talk) 06:39, 6 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 16:54, 6 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 16:54, 6 April 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.