Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of micronations


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was keep. After reviewing Talk:Kingdom of Talossa, Talk:Republic of Talossa (where an old VFD discussion can be found), and the related Articles for deletion/Republic of Talossa (and refreshing my memory of Articles for deletion/Talossan language, and Articles for deletion/R. Ben Madison) it is clear that this AFD nomination is disruption resulting from editors losing a content dispute on this list article with other editors who are attempting to keep original research out of Wikipedia. Don't disrupt Wikipedia to illustrate a point. Uncle G 23:56, 8 August 2006 (UTC)

List of micronations
This page should be deleted because it will never provide a list of all micronations because of mean admins. --Kitia
 * Speedy keep, bad-faith nomination. Gazpacho 18:27, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy keep per Gaspacho. —Whomp t/c  18:31, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Strong Keep. This is a maintainable, manageable list and supports an existing article. Agent 86 18:34, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Strong Keep and Speedy keep per Gaspacho and Agent 86. This is a completely fine list, and there is no reason why it should be deleted. Bad-faith nomination. --S-man 18:36, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep per everyone above me.--Isotope23 19:42, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep. Article provides clear guidelines on qualifications for inclusion. As Agent 86 said, this is maintainable and manageable. Scorpiondollprincess 19:43, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy Keep per mean admins. Danny Lilithborne 20:51, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep per all of the above. Yamaguchi先生 22:10, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy keep. Bad faith nomination. --Centauri 23:17, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.