Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of minor characters in Tokyo Mew Mew (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. GlassCobra 07:51, 17 March 2008 (UTC)

List of minor characters in Tokyo Mew Mew
AfDs for this article: 
 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

List of extremely minor characters from the Tokyo Mew Mew series. Most of those who are listed here have only appeared in a single episode of the anime adaptation, and do not appear in the original manga at all. None of them are notable for mention. This list is pretty much episode plot regurgitation and fancruft. Renominating now that that injunction has been lifted. Collectonian (talk) 01:05, 11 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Anime and manga-related deletion discussions.   —Collectonian (talk) 01:05, 11 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete as an indiscriminate collection of primarily one shot characters; also qualifies as a plot summary of sorts. Ten Pound Hammer  and his otters • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 01:58, 11 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: Article was nominated for the second time about an hour and twenty minutes ago, but the article itself was never marked with the appropriate AfD template. This has now been done. ··· 日本穣 ? · Talk to Nihonjoe 02:21, 11 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Thanks...wonder why Twinkle didn't get it that time. Collectonian (talk) 02:36, 11 March 2008 (UTC)
 * No idea. I just figured it was a good idea to mark the article. I found out about it because I was going to do a procedural nomination after injunction was lifted, and I found out you'd already done part of it. ··· 日本穣 ? · Talk to Nihonjoe 01:25, 12 March 2008 (UTC)


 * Speedy keep as this article was previously nominated only 3 days ago (March 8) and speedy kept and aside from the ArbCom injunction there were already several keep votes at the time it was closed. 23skidoo (talk) 12:08, 11 March 2008 (UTC)
 * The close was administrative and arguably done inappropriately. This is a valid, good-faith nomination and the debate should be started over on its own merits. —Quasirandom (talk) 14:35, 11 March 2008 (UTC)
 * The close was administrative, but was not inappropriate. I agree that this is a good faith nomination (as is the previous nomination), and I was going to procedurally nominate it as soon as the injunction was lifted, but Collectonian beat me to it. ··· 日本穣 ? · Talk to Nihonjoe 01:25, 12 March 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete per TenPoundHammer and per failure to satisfy WP:N. The first AFD was inappropriately and prematurely closed after less than 4 hours. Edison (talk) 15:23, 11 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Stop with the bad faith accusations already. The close was administrative, but was not inappropriate. I don't personally give a damn one way or the other if this article is kept. ··· 日本穣 ? · Talk to Nihonjoe 01:25, 12 March 2008 (UTC)


 * Keep Other Anime series have a list of minor characters. Why should this be an exception? Young Web Programmer  msg  16:41, 11 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Please refer to WP:OTHERSTUFF for an explanation. As there is some merit in such a list, I am recommending moving some of the content to a new article. G.A.S 10:26, 15 March 2008 (UTC)


 * Keep, this list is probably preferable to having articles for each minor character. And WP:ITSCRUFT is not a valid reason for deletion. --Pixelface (talk) 20:19, 11 March 2008 (UTC)
 * The valid reason is none of them are notable and per several MOS and guidelines, we do not mention every last bit character to make a few second appearance on screen. None of these are major characters. They do not need individual articles, certainly, nor do they need a list. Collectonian (talk) 20:29, 11 March 2008 (UTC)
 * They don't have to be notable to be mentioned in a list. --Pixelface (talk) 12:49, 12 March 2008 (UTC)


 *  Delete ; Fails notability requirements: except for the Kanji links, and the mere mention of the names in the only source, none of the information has any independent, reliable sources whatsoever. The other information is plot information only, which can be deleted. The information may be transwiki'd at a later stage if needed — editors wishing to perform this may refer to Deletion review if this article is deleted. G.A.S 05:54, 12 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional characters-related deletion discussions.   —Pixelface (talk) 12:52, 12 March 2008 (UTC)
 * keep siitable compromise way of handling the minor characters. They do not have to be individualy notable. DGG (talk) 06:51, 13 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep per DGG. A list of characters is a good enough way to provide comprehensive coverage. Sjakkalle (Check!)  10:21, 13 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Smerge and redirect to List of characters in Tokyo Mew Mew; I believe the recurring characters's information may be kept, but not every single character that ever appeared in the anime. G.A.S 05:50, 14 March 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete - there is no need to have a list of every character who appears in a show. Move any worth keeping to the regular character list, delete the rest. Doceirias (talk) 23:31, 14 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep as a discriminate and verfiable list and because the previous nominations was but a few days ago. Best, --  Le Grand Roi des Citrouilles  Tally-ho! 18:40, 16 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Previous close was administrative due to ArbCom Temporary injunction (since lifted). G.A.S 05:40, 17 March 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.