Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of mobile advertising networks


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   merge to Mobile advertising. ‑Scottywong | comment _ 16:53, 21 March 2013 (UTC)

List of mobile advertising networks

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Article consists of only a few notable companies. It has no content and is being used as a place to dump advertisements. I propose we create a category and just add the pages in this article to it. Free Bullets (talk) 07:28, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Advertising-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:13, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:13, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:13, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:14, 5 March 2013 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Courcelles 00:57, 12 March 2013 (UTC)


 * Merge. While I doubt that many of the businesses listed here are encyclopedia subjects, we do have an article on mobile advertising, the subject probably is notable, and as such a relatively short list like this could be appended to it.  Those blue links will need to be looked at.  - Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 02:00, 12 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Merge. I don't see the need for the list to exist as an article. Perhaps it could be merged as described above, or it could be made into a template and added to the relevant article's pages. Ducknish (talk) 02:20, 12 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep or merge. It's a notable topic, and the list can do things categories can't, e.g. indicate where the company is defunct or has been taken over. It's on the short side for a list article, but not ridiculously short, and it could be expanded into a table with summary info, e.g. dates of founding, country it's based in, takeovers. However, there is an obvious merge target, so if the consensus is to merge I would not oppose. --Colapeninsula (talk) 10:08, 12 March 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete and Salt. It appears to be corporate advertising. METOKNOWONLY (talk) 02:11, 13 March 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.