Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of months by year: 1800-1899

 This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was delete. &mdash; Xezbeth 20:10, Jun 22, 2005 (UTC)

List of months by year: 1800-1899, List of months by year: 1700-1799, List of months by year: 1600-1699, List of months by year
See Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/List of months by year: 1900-1999. – ugen64 01:59, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Just to clarify: my vote is delete. – ugen64 14:38, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)


 * Keep Just found these pages - they seem really useful 12:06, 19 Jun 2005 (UTC) [anonymous user]
 * Delete these seas of red links. Denni &#9775; 03:07, 2005 Jun 16 (UTC)
 * Keep Harmless. If people want to do this, let them. It doesn't matter if it takes years to do just a fraction of the months. CalJW 05:49, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete as per previous discussion at Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/List of months by year: 1900-1999. --Tabor 06:58, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep Harmless; as notable as dates and years. siafu 07:38, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete as per precedent set by Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/List of months by year: 1900-1999. JamesBurns 07:48, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, as per precedent. Proto 09:30, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, as per precedent. &mdash; mark &#9998; 10:32, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete as per precedent set by Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/List of months by year: 1900-1999 - Skysmith 10:50, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. I don't see a need for this at the moment, and this should not be something created from the top down, with potential forking problems. If the year articles were overlong (and only the most recent are long) then it would be justified in splitting them up into months. Average Earthman 11:46, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, we can create it once it becomes necessary, if it ever does. --W(t) 13:25, 2005 Jun 16 (UTC)
 * Delete this today, delete it tomorrow, delete it Saturday, delete it Sunday, and so forth until December 31, 2199. Precedent, and unencyclopedic uselessness.  Where's Kappa's "Keep, real months" vote?  Barno 20:11, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete every list that is fifty bajillion redlinks. ::eyes zoning out&hellip;can't focus&hellip;too much red&hellip;:: Hermione1980 23:44, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Comment I believe that before these are deleted, any blue links should be fixed on the pages that link there since they are likely not pointing to the right article in most cases. 65.40.145.19 05:23, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Hmmmm. Is it a coincidence or does every year listed have the same twelve months? Weird. Anyway, Delete. -R. fiend 05:50, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)


 * This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages.  Please do not edit this page .