Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of most-followed Instagram Business accounts


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Primefac (talk) 16:02, 17 February 2019 (UTC)

List of most-followed Instagram Business accounts

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

List is not encyclopedic content and we are not the Hot 100. Looks like listcruft and WP:NOTSTATS. List is nothing more than poll/popularity data that is subject to rapid changes and maintaining these lists is not what Wikipedia is about. These lists are magnets for UPE/COI promotional editors. Created by a sockpuppet for these purposes. — Berean Hunter   (talk)  15:22, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions.  ~Ruyaba~   {talk}  16:13, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions.  ~Ruyaba~   {talk}  16:13, 10 February 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete per WP:NOTSTATS. Only source appears to be a self published one. Ajf773 (talk) 19:55, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep: Very interesting list! People look at Wikipedia exactly for this kind of stuff. --Checco (talk) 20:02, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
 * WP:INTERESTING is not a suitable reason for keeping an article. Ajf773 (talk) 20:06, 10 February 2019 (UTC)


 * Speedy delete per A10. Duplicates the main Instagram list.  Would not be averse to a redirect.    SITH   (talk)   23:43, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete Agree with above, the main list already serves its purpose, one this specific is trivial listcruft. Yeenosaurus   (talk) 🍁 01:27, 11 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete Listcruft, arbitrary list. talk to ! dave
 * Delete per WP:NOTSTATS. --K.e.coffman (talk) 23:30, 11 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete because it is a mirror of SocialBlade, and also because Instagram changed its data collection policy to exclude non-business accounts for public statistics. Where are Selena Gomez, Justin Bieber, the Kardashians, the Jenners and more? Since they use personal (not business) accounts, we see NatGeo, Nike, Victoria's Secret and more getting higher ranks on this "top accounts" list. Just scrap the list, and confine this to a small paragraph on Instagram's page. --LABcrabs (talk) 04:30, 13 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete – The category of Instagram "business accounts" is an arbitrary one; there is no need to track them separately from regular accounts. — JFG talk 15:17, 14 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete—seemingly arbitrary distinction. —  python coder    (talk &#124; contribs) 23:09, 14 February 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.