Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of most-liked pages on Facebook


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ansh 666 07:53, 26 December 2017 (UTC)

List of most-liked pages on Facebook

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

The subject does not meet LISTN, the applicable notability guideline, and it likely runs afoul of RAWDATA as well. Rebb ing  02:41, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk &bull;&#32;mail) 03:13, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk &bull;&#32;mail) 03:13, 3 December 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete- WP:Listcruft--Rusf10 (talk) 03:39, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Comment - found these two sources:
 * http://www.adweek.com/digital/top-25-facebook-pages-september-2014-facebook-for-every-phone-nearing-500m-likes/#/
 * https://www.cnbc.com/amp/2015/06/09/the-10-most-popular-celebrities-on-facebook.html
 *  Ꞷ  umbolo   11:29, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:30, 10 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. The top one or two pages could be mentioned in the main article, if needed.  Lugnuts  Fire Walk with Me 08:12, 11 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Popular culture-related deletion discussions. North America1000 20:33, 11 December 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep. The sources brought up by Wumbolo are examples of significant and independent coverage of the topic of top Facebook pages.  The notability guideline for standalone lists states that "one accepted reason why a list topic is considered notable is if it has been discussed as a group or set by independent reliable sources".  By this criteria, the list is notable and should be kept.   Malinaccier  ( talk ) 01:13, 18 December 2017 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, &mdash; Coffee //  have a ☕️ //  beans  // 02:15, 18 December 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete WP:Listcruft, and if this list were to be kept I would imagine that many updates to this list would be based off of original research. Grapefruit17 (talk) 02:11, 21 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete WP:LISTCRUFT. Information can be mentioned on their main pages of the listed subjects. Raymond3023 (talk) 17:16, 21 December 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.