Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of most prolific porn stars


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Eddie891 Talk Work 00:45, 19 April 2023 (UTC)

List of most prolific porn stars

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Difficult to impossible to do a BEFORE search on, but is mostly sourced with database listings. I dream of horses (Contribs) (Talk) 00:12, 12 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers, Women,  and Lists of people. I dream of horses (Contribs) (Talk) 00:12, 12 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete. There is really no usable definition for what constitutes "most prolific" in a field where there are no strict definitions of what constitutes an individual work. BD2412  T 00:16, 12 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete Arbitrary, meaningless criteria for a list. Zaathras (talk) 00:21, 12 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. &#8213;  "Ghost of Dan Gurney" (talk)  00:25, 12 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete. These kinds of lists are almost by definition OR. No objection to replacing it with a List of people identified as most prolific porn stars in reliable sources. pburka (talk) 00:26, 12 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete per User:Zaathras. –  City Urbanism  🗩   🖉  08:43, 12 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. Shellwood (talk) 10:04, 12 April 2023 (UTC)


 * Delete. Fails WP:NLIST. A quick googling shows a handful of individual performers being described as "one of the most prolific porn stars", but little coverage of the topic as a . The current list is pure WP:OR based on WP:USERGENERATED sources anyway. —Sangdeboeuf (talk) 10:50, 12 April 2023 (UTC) edited 08:14, 18 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete: As BD2412 indicated, we don't actually have any usable definition for "most prolific". This is clear OR and it fails WP:NLIST. Hey man im josh (talk) 18:51, 17 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete: I am sure this list is of interest to many, but there's no way i see it fitting into wikipedia with this lack of sourcing.  Interestingly, the only "most prolific" article I found that we currently have is related to a redirect for Most prolific serial killers; nothing for non-pornographic actors.  So no real precedent for it even with sourcing.  According to List of Wikipedians by article count only 164 wikipedians currently have written more articles than pornographic films Yui Hatano has allegedly appeared in (3,129).  Slackers.--Milowent • hasspoken  20:44, 18 April 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.