Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of most viewed video on youtube


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. The Bushranger One ping only 07:30, 5 September 2012 (UTC)

List of most viewed video on youtube

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

No notability, bad page name. Vincent Liu (something to say?) 08:33, 29 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete The link to youtube does not support the claim of "most viewed" anything and lands on a page full of advertisements and assorted videos that are not specific. The artist credits land on dictionary pages (baby, for one) or various wiki links to artists, which again have nothing to do with youtube viewing statistics. The sources simply don't pan out and fail WP:SOURCES and the links land in arbitrary places that do not support the article and run afoul of WP:LINKFARM.  Distinctly WP:NN collection of uselessness. Яεñ99 (talk) 10:19, 29 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete per Ren99.  GregJackP   Boomer!   10:45, 29 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete Any worthy data can be covered in the main Youtube article.  Lugnuts  And the horse 17:34, 29 August 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete Firrst of all, the sources are all unreliable and are actually external links to the videos. It also fails WP: SOURCES. The article itself does not assert any notability, and as Lugnuts said, any notable data can be covered in the main article. Electric Catfish 22:38, 29 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete - Can be covered in YouTube and has poor sources. Did I also mention that the title's grammar is terrible?  Zappa  O  Mati   00:13, 30 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 16:44, 30 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 16:44, 30 August 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.