Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of mother porn stars


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Delete. —Quarl (talk) 2007-03-07 04:37Z 

List of mother porn stars

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Is pornstars who happen to be mothers (and not dead etc?) really a suitable topic for a list like this? I know "if we have this we would have to have X" is a dubious argument. However, in this case I think it might be valid. You could have a similar list for any category of women, filmstars, politicians etc (or fathers for that matter). It's not encyclopaedic. Also the list fails WP:ATT as it is unreferenced. In addition it may breach the privacy of the offspring named Jules1975 14:16, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete List of mother pornstars is a very broad category that covers a large percentage of female pornstars. Wikipedia isn't an indiscriminate collection of information. --Strangerer (Talk) 14:58, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete - Violates WP:BIO, WP:N, and WP:REF. Plain useless information.  L  uis  1972   (Talk  •  My Contribs)  15:26, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete as much as I'd love to keep an article that contains: "(Shit queen) Alexia Cage: she was starring in Pregnant Hard Shit Games, in which she swallowed shit, piss and puke straight from a male costar—while she was six months pregnant" I really can't bring myself to justify keeping a fundementally asinine and superfluous artilce. NeoFreak 15:52, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per the above arguments. A list of porn stars is sufficiently non-arbitrary, but when you start creating all sorts of derivative lists with an arbitrary qualifiers such as this one, is when we are getting silly.  Not to mention the fact that the title is confusing, it isn't readily apparent what is meant by "mother porn stars". Arkyan 16:08, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per above. Furthermore, the article is full of POV statements. --Xnuala 17:16, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete until wikipedia creates a WP:MILF category. TonyTheTiger 22:45, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete - this is inherently confusing. What is a "mother porn star"?  Is it a porn star who performed while pregnant?  Is it a porn star who had a child while performing?  Is it a porn star who had pre-existing children?  Does it count if she adopted them?  What if she marries, and her husband has kids already?  What if she has kids after no longer performing?  What if she becomes a nun, and then reaches the rank of Mother Superior?  You get the point.  WP:NOT.  --Haemo 00:30, 3 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per the two well-reasoned yet extremely humorous comments above. Even if someone were to start an encyclopedic article on the topics of Pregnancy and erotica or Motherhood in pornography (or something similar), this article is not a good starting point.  It's unreferenced, the prose (that exists) is somewhat convoluted, and the material itself is occasionally POV. -- Black Falcon 02:58, 3 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per Black Falcon. Pavel Vozenilek 16:26, 4 March 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.