Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of music acts whose names contain an adverb


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. Tito xd (?!?) 05:57, 29 October 2005 (UTC)

List of music acts whose names contain an adverb
Totally uninteresting and pointless list. Reyk 00:12, 21 October 2005 (UTC)


 * Delete per nomination Reyk 00:10, 21 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. This is the ultimate in listcruft, simply begging to be deleted. Besides, “down” and “out” are not adverbs, they are prepositions. &spades;DanMS 00:29, 21 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Not just pointless, but totally incorrect. Andrew pmk | Talk 00:50, 21 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Man what's next?  List of band names containing the letter 'V'? --W.marsh 01:20, 21 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Looks like an attempt to win some kind of prize for the wierdest and most pointless list on Wikipedia. (Actually down and out are adverbs, but that's by the by.) Flapdragon 01:24, 21 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Per Nom -Haon 01:36, 21 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. You have got to be kidding. From the editor who brought us List of movies whose title contains a fraction or non-integer. --Calton | Talk 02:10, 21 October 2005 (UTC)
 * This guy has a mania for lists. Reyk 02:47, 21 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete Maybe a list of music acts that involve instruments will be next...Karmafist 03:00, 21 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. But why isn't List of movies whose title contains a fraction or non-integer up for deletion? FRS 03:04, 21 October 2005 (UTC)
 * By all means put it up. Reyk 03:12, 21 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Comment. In general internet users rank integers over adverbs in their 'slighly interesting topics' box. But I agree that it's rediculous.  freshgavin ΓΛĿЌ 04:58, 21 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Not useful. *drew 11:46, 21 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Now this is getting silly. 23skidoo 13:50, 21 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete per who? the nominator, of course. Molotov (talk) [[Image:Flag of California.svg|25px]]  16:05, 21 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete Unreal. Marskell 16:59, 21 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete per nominator --Holderca1 18:42, 21 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, listcruft at its worst. Punkmorten 19:46, 21 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Crufty cruft cruft. - Sensor 22:20, 21 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete Very sad - eight bands on the list, and only two of them with real adverbs in their names! Grutness...  wha?  00:04, 22 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, erase, bleach eyeballs, ban user, sow salt in fields. MCB 00:53, 22 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Strong Delete this listcruft --JAranda &#124; watz sup 01:32, 22 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Wow. gren グレン 03:59, 22 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Per nom. Someone was really bored when they created this. I'm trying count how many people care about articles of speech in band names. Delete the shear stupidity. Hurricane Eric - my dropsonde 18:42, 22 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Neutral. The list was my idea (see comments in Talk:List of movies whose title is eponymous with a character in it) but I never thought anyone would take it seriously and start an article.  I'll stay out of the vote, but in the article's defense, not that it matters, all the adverbs are real adverbs contrary to the opinions of self-appointed grammar experts DanMS and Grutness, with the possible exception of Reel in Reel Big Fish, which is only a pun on an adverb.  Let's keep on task; I really don't think the factual accuracy of the article is in question.  CyborgTosser (Only half the battle) 18:25, 23 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete as completely idiosyncratic non-topic. Dpbsmith (talk) 15:06, 24 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete as bad joke --Tremont30 22:31, 24 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, although all the words do appear to be adverbs. --TantalumTelluride 17:46, 26 October 2005 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.