Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of national parks of Dominica


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was - dubious consensus, but more keep than delete. See Talk:List of national parks of Dominica for more. Tom e rtalk 07:58, 8 February 2006 (UTC)

List of national parks of Dominica
As per Belarus, it's a list of one park. Stifle 11:45, 2 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep and expand &mdash; The article might only have one park, but it looks notable enough. If there are more parks, perhaps the author simply hasn't gone to all of them, nor know of them, and is waiting for other editors to edit. Kareeser|Talk! 14:38, 2 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. When Dominica gets more than one park, then we can make a list.  Until then, it is utterly redundant listcruft.  Starry Eyes  16:13, 2 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete and replace with a category. I'm sure there are more NPs in Dominica but a Cat. will catch them all, no need for a list. :Supergolden:: 17:31, 2 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep and expand per Kareeser. Royboycrashfan 19:51, 2 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep All countries with a national park should have a list of national parks. Merchbow 19:58, 2 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep Both Lists and Categories are useful. Jcuk 22:10, 2 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete unless at least two more exist and are added. Single item lists are retarded, and can't even qualify as a list. If this is the only park then all links to this article can be replaced with the name of the park, which is much more sensible. -R. fiend 23:49, 2 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep. Article expanded sufficiently. -R. fiend 06:59, 5 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, unless someone can be bothered to find more than one park to actually make it a list. Lists and cats can both be useful, so there's no good reason to delete it in that regard. - Mgm|(talk) 10:29, 3 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep &mdash; They have a bunch of national parks. I added some. &mdash; RJH 16:16, 3 February 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.