Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of non-profit organizations

 This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. JeremyA (talk) 03:15, 14 September 2005 (UTC)

List of non-profit organizations
del. A list of external links. mikka (t) 00:11, 6 September 2005 (UTC)


 * Delete. Even if written properly, redundant with Category:Non-profit_organizations. — Phil Welch 00:27, 6 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete - prefer categories over lists, personally. Rob Church Talk 00:57, 6 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete per Philwelch. Jaxl | talk 01:55, 6 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, I also prefer the category rather than the list. --Hoovernj 02:22, 6 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Improve. List could provide a short information for each entry while category cannot. Both exist for their own reasons. This list could be improved. --Plastictv 02:30, 6 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete: Can never be complete nor verified, has no standards of discrimination between significant and not. Geogre 02:42, 6 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete i prefer category. Jobe  6  [[Image:Peru flag large.png|20px]] 03:04, September 6, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, scope is impossibly broad. As it stands it would encompass essentially every organization in the world which is not a business (for instance, most universities and political parties). - choster 03:06, 6 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Yes, I said it.  Use categories instead.  &mdash;RaD Man (talk) 03:56, 6 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Comment: Currently, it falls under CSD A3: "Any article whose contents consist only of an external link, "See also" section, book reference, category tag, template tag, interwiki link, or rephrasing of the title." Zzyzx11 (Talk) 04:22, 6 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Although I feel that lists and categories can co-exist, lists of external links should go.  Zoe 04:26, September 6, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. List is redundant due to the existance of a category. – AxSkov ( ☏ ) 07:10, 6 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, redundant with category and far too broad. A few very notable examples are listed in the main article. the wub   "?/!"  10:14, 6 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Slap. Lists and categories serve different purposes and can coexist as per Zoe. But still a list external links should go as per policy. Delete. - Mgm|(talk) 10:59, September 6, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. While CSD criterion A3 (Any article whose contents consist only of an external link [...]) should probably be interpreted as allowing only the deletion of articles containing one link and no lead, it might be a good idea to rephrase it in order to cover this case. / Alarm 17:39, 6 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete non-article -- red stucco 08:28, 12 September 2005 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.