Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of notable Enzo Ferrari owners


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Cirt (talk) 07:44, 8 May 2009 (UTC)

List of notable Enzo Ferrari owners

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

My reason is: Pointless piece of trivia which is no relevance to an encyclopedia site

Not to mention that also none of these are sourced, as the fact is how do you know these people really own them or have they borrowed the car. Thirdly, wasn't there a list that got deleted sometimes ago and lastly, how many of these people (those without its own article) is eligible for its own article. Donnie Park (talk) 21:00, 1 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Clearly not a defining criterion of any of these people, and nearly impossible to verify. Ten Pound Hammer  and his otters • (Many otters • One hammer • HELP) 21:10, 1 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete just cruft. Some of the "owners" like the Pope are important to the history of the Enzo, but that should be covered in the main Enzo article — Preceding unsigned comment added by Daniel J. Leivick (talk • contribs)


 * Delete Tried to work on it, but in the end it is pure listcruft ukexpat (talk) 21:59, 1 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:INDISCRIMINATE (which really should have a listing for "trivia"). DreamGuy (talk) 22:28, 1 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Strong Delete as per the nomination - Wikipedia is not a place for unencyclopedic lists of junk and none of it has any reliable sources. It fails What Wikipedia is not, Reliable sources and this list is also is in the lines of listcruft. Sjones23 (talk - contributions) 22:55, 1 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete as per everyone. Isn't it Snowing yet? Edward321 (talk) 00:41, 2 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions.  -- — LinguistAtLarge • Talk  02:54, 2 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions.  -- ukexpat (talk) 21:46, 2 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete, the question of who owns a limited-edition, luxury brand of car is not relevant to the notability of that brand. And reliable sources documenting notable people who own them are impossible to find unless you actually try (then it's a piece of cake). Wuzziest (talk) 08:51, 3 May 2009 (UTC)
 * User indef blocked, see ANI thread --Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:53, 4 May 2009 (UTC)


 * Çomment, that offending list, plus many others originated here and other similar articles that used to appear in or ripped off from Wikipedia. Donnie Park (talk) 10:43, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Per nominator. Afkatk (talk) 07:30, 7 May 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.