Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of notable Veterans of other conflicts (second nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. --Sam Blanning(talk) 20:38, 14 July 2006 (UTC)

List of notable Veterans of other conflicts
The last time we looked at this, it was decided to split. That was 5 months ago. Since that time, nobody has done any maintenance on the article, and it's just as pointless as it was before. As my mother used to say, shit, or get off the pot -- RoySmith (talk) 12:14, 8 July 2006 (UTC) style="color: rgb(255, 10, 0);"> Humphreys SPEAK TO MEABOUTTHE THINGS I MESSED UP 16:12, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as per nom.    Dl yo ns 493   Ta lk  13:23, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Strong Delete as per nom. This article is silly.  What are "other conflicts", and why are there only five people listed? Cmcl14 15:31, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as pointless, useless and as per nom David <span
 * Delete The "other" seems to be a reference to these being conflicts not listed on List of military veterans. There is not a chance in hell that anyone will search wikipedia for a list of six unconnected people who fought in the American Civil War, the Falklands and the Mahdist War. Also, this serves no purpose that categories, such as Falklands War people and United States Army soldiers, do not already. --IslaySolomon 18:21, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Strange, badly thought out and almost empty list. Bwithh 20:17, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom, and because obviously no one cares too much. --DaveG12345 21:45, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, useless list, no criteria for "other conflicts". --Core des at talk. o.o;; 03:47, 9 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Landolitan 12:48, 9 July 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.