Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of notable people and characters with premature gray or graying hair


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. Mailer Diablo 15:59, 5 April 2006 (UTC)

List of notable people and characters with premature gray or graying hair
inane, unmaintainable, listcruft, this is what, 30% of the entirety of all biographical articles about a male subject and some of the females too? SchmuckyTheCat 10:19, 31 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Inane, insane, and nutty cruft. Not only would it be massive (as per Schmucky), it's utterly unverifiable (people dye their hair, which is not a verifiable fact)), it's POV (at what age do you decide someone is prematurely graying, or just graying?  20?  30?  40?). 'Bluuuurgh' is the sound I make as I vomit delete upon its crufty and putrid body.       Proto    ||    type    10:30, 31 March 2006 (UTC)
 * ROFL! LOL! Concur, concur, delete! -- P199 16:23, 31 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Strong Delete --Mmx1 15:36, 31 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, useless. Punkmorten 16:30, 31 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, listcruft. --Ter e nce Ong 17:10, 31 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Strong Delete as listcruft per Proto. At what point of grey/white to original hair color ratio are are you considered to be prematurely "greying" vs "grey"?  Is it premature if your genetic ancestry is such that everyone in your family has roughly 35% grey to color ratio by age 28?  No way this could ever be anything but POV opinion.--Isotope23 17:11, 31 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Just not useful. Scranchuse 17:30, 31 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per Proto, of course. Never was the template "..you can help by expanding it" more inapt. Sandstein 18:35, 31 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete simply POV (who decides prematurely) Tearstar 18:43, 31 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as per nom.    Dl yo ns 493   Ta lk  19:33, 31 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as inherently POV. --Lockley 23:05, 31 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as absolutely useless listcruft. When I clicked on this, I knew that Taylor Hicks would be one of maybe a few entries. -- Kinu  t /c  23:24, 31 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, per WP:V, WP:NPOV, WP:NOT, ...  A    q    uilina   00:35, 1 April 2006 (UTC)
 * WEAK: Add more and submit it to the BJAODN could have potential to be funny. Walksonwalls 02:41, 1 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per above. --Khoikhoi 03:25, 1 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. I started going gray at 15.  Would that qualify?  --Midnighttonight 08:19, 1 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Are you notable?--86.6.254.141 17:45, 2 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Extreme Lesbian Neutral. All this "this page is useless cruft but per policy we can't make it explode" being stated over and over again makes me giggle. --User:Lugiatm (talk • contribs) 17:48, 2 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete! Fight the moose! --SirNuke 06:51, 3 April 2006 (UTC)


 * Keep I have received much thanks for this article from prominent anthropologists. --Savethemooses 22:50, 3 April 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.