Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of notable people who have used cannabis


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. —Kirill Lok s hin 02:23, 25 January 2006 (UTC)

List of notable people who have used cannabis
Highly dubiopus, highly partisan list that doesn't add to the encyclopedia. This article fails to link in to other cannabis articles, and unlike them is not encyclopedic and is clealry anything but a notable list of people who have used cannabis SqueakBox 14:13, 19 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, list bound to grow to incredible lengths, become less reliable.Bjones 14:15, 19 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment, I've never done cannabis or even gotten drunk, but for some reason I fell upon working at this a bit. Doing so was mostly a waste of time so I don't object to delete at all.--T. Anthony 14:19, 19 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. The list at List of iconic smokers is enough. And if completed, the list will have tens of thousands of entries, making it useless. Kusma (討論) 14:22, 19 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Then just delete. Although a few of the better sourced ones here that aren't at iconic smokers could maybe be added.--T. Anthony 14:25, 19 January 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete. Way to broad of a list, would have to include most musicians, actors, politicians, etc born after 1945 or so. Youngamerican 14:33, 19 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Such a list is not needed. --Terence Ong 15:22, 19 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. To broad to have a reasonable criteria for exclusion, which any list should, or it's pointless.  --Esprit15d 15:50, 19 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Unverifiable, POV magnet, and a list that is unmaintainable, of interest to few people, or apparently created just for the sake of having a list, i.e. listcruft. Stifle 15:59, 19 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep This list does have some sources, if it had them for all of the notable people, than I would Keep it for sure. I don't think it would be too broad with a requirement that every name has a source, and it has some value if you were interested in the face that many people who have used cannabis are now famous. Vertigo700 16:45, 19 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete This is very useless. Makes the wikipedia a trivia source of unverified origin. The Deviant 16:52, 19 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Barely verifiable trivia. Carina22 20:36, 19 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete --NaconKantari 21:30, 19 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as above. Pointless. --kingboyk 23:56, 19 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete listcruft -- Astrokey44 |talk 00:27, 20 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep what can be verified, seems like very useful list.  Grue   17:40, 22 January 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.