Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of notable storms on the Great Lakes


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. —Tom Morris (talk) 08:37, 19 April 2012 (UTC)

List of notable storms on the Great Lakes

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

Written more like an essay than an article. -- C h r o m a Nebula  (talk)   00:50, 12 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Articles for deletion/Log/2012 April 12.  Snotbot   t &bull; c &raquo;  01:01, 12 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep Not a perfect article, but provides interesting information with some references, and scope for improvement. "Written more like an essay than an article" is not reason for deletion if the article could be rewritten (see WP:BEGIN). --Colapeninsula (talk) 09:40, 12 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Comment: please note that there is an active move discussion in progress for this article. Powers T 14:29, 12 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep. MemoRamso (talk) 19:07, 12 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 00:48, 13 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 00:48, 13 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Environment-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 00:49, 13 April 2012 (UTC)


 * Keep The style may not be encyclopedic, but the content is. While I would suggest that List of storms on the Great Lakes would be more in conformity with Manual of Style/Lists, this is a good place to put information about notable storms that do not need their own separate article. It also seems to meet the stand-alone list criteria of Manual of Style/Stand-alone lists. --Bejnar (talk) 19:26, 16 April 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.