Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of noteworthy raves


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. Dakota 06:51, 2 December 2006 (UTC)

List of noteworthy raves
POV listcruft, completely unsourced. User:Zoe|(talk) 01:07, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as per nom. A category can be created for the ones with articles, if need be Bwithh 01:15, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, listcruft, Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information. - Mailer Diablo 03:39, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per above. MER-C 05:27, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Weak Delete it seems to be ok but Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of info. James086Talk 05:32, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete The very title of the article seems to be inherently POV. --The Way 07:00, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete violates WP:NOT  K yo cat  ¿Qué tal?♥meow! 20:04, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete the bulk of the article is indeed listcruft, falls under WP:NOT.¤~Persian Poet Gal (talk) 22:39, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment. Agree that this article, as it currently stands, is POV and should probably be deleted. However, the article is not baseless and I would like to see it rewritten -based on quantitive barometers such as attendance records or media notibility- as a category under, say, Electronica or Acid House. Encise 23:21, 26 November 2006 (UTC)Encise
 * Strong Keep This article came out of a long discussion on the Talk:Rave page. Consensus was reached that the list of famous raves needed to be moved to a new article.  More than 9 article in the list have there own page and  many have sources.  A POV title does not mean a POV page.  Many lists have less references.   Rex the first  talk 00:40, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment I have asked some users that contributed to the discussion to make this article to contribute to this Afd. Rex the first  talk 00:43, 27 November 2006 (UTC)

background:yellow; border:1px solid black;">&#x2622; 02:06, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per what Mailer Diablo said. Notable raves...hahaha.--Agent Aquamarine 01:08, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
 * I guess a crowd of over 3 million doesnt make a rave notable... *cough* Love Parade *cough*.  ALKIVAR &trade; &#x2622; 02:06, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as unsourced original research, despite assisting in creation. Sad to see it go, but can't justify a keep. &there4; here&hellip;&spades; 01:22, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep there were guidelines put in place to restrict this to multi-year events or one off events of extremely large notability. Deleting this means this content will just get readded a bazillion times by various anonymous users in the Rave article... which is why we spun this list off to begin with.  ALKIVAR &trade; <span style="font-size:130%;
 * Keep per Alkivar. bbx 08:19, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
 * I'm sorry, but what part of unsourced and POV do you not understand? User:Zoe|(talk) 18:20, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete I'd like to keep it, but without sources, Zoe is right, this is totally POV. It needs some kind of objective criterion of inclusion and then sourcing for what is included.--Kchase T 23:09, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. POV. WMMartin 17:49, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete - unmanageable, mention 5 or so within the rave article, and don't worry about the rest --T-rex 19:14, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. It needs sources explaining the notability of these raves, not just links to their respective sites. Black-Velvet  04:55, 2 December 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.