Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of number-one singles of 2010 (Luxembourg)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 16:54, 14 December 2018 (UTC)

List of number-one singles of 2010 (Luxembourg)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Also nominating the following related lists:

Lists of number ones for a chart which doesn't receive coverage in third-party sources. Published by Billboard, a primary source, based on digital sales, and the only place where this information will be found. No relevance given to the chart itself and no significance given for reaching number one on it. Star cheers peaks news lost wars Talk to me 19:46, 30 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 20:49, 30 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 20:49, 30 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Luxembourg-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 20:49, 30 November 2018 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kirbanzo (talk) 18:19, 7 December 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete the country is so small that residents listen to stations from neighboring countries shop for music elsewhere too. This is just a silly exercise in tracking. Legacypac (talk) 18:22, 7 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:13, 7 December 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete all - lack of secondary sources Spiderone  19:06, 10 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete: It is just a relist of billboard charts with no secondary sources. As Legacypac stated, it is unnecessary tracking.  Denied Club  ❯❯❯ talk?   09:26, 14 December 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.