Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of number 1 ranked Bollywood actresses in the 2013 Times Celebex rankings


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Times Celebex: Bollywood Stars' Rating. I would say there is no consensus here between deleting and merging but given that closing as no consensus would mean defaulting to keep which would be perverse and that the other lists have been merged am defaulting to merge. Davewild (talk) 07:09, 14 July 2015 (UTC)

List of number 1 ranked Bollywood actresses in the 2013 Times Celebex rankings

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

WP: UNDUE coverage of one newspaper's ratings Krimuk | 90  ( talk ) 07:15, 17 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:33, 18 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists of people-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:33, 18 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:34, 18 June 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete This and the other three, they should all have been combined to a single nomination. The Times Celebex ratings have received no traction except in in-house publications of the ToI group and some fansites. Nothing RS except their own coverage of this. &mdash; Spaceman  Spiff  12:37, 21 June 2015 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 02:02, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Boldly moving to List of number 1 ranked Bollywood actresses in the 2013 Times Celebex rankings: The ranking list is notable, even for individual years, however it is undue weight to refer to any ranking list's opinion without an identifier in the title. Esquivalience t 02:35, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Having two separate lists for actors and actresses is unnecessary, so merge both of them together. Esquivalience t 02:45, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Everything is from Times of India or Economic Times, the publisher of this ranking, there's nothing in any other reliable source media. &mdash; Spaceman  Spiff  03:32, 24 June 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Merge to Times Celebex: Bollywood Stars' Rating. It does look like sources justify the Times Celebex ranking in general being notable, but I see no reason they can't be covered together. &mdash;  Rhododendrites talk  \\ 15:37, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete but NO merge: Obviously this fails the GNG and WP:NOT going away.  I don't see a purpose to redirecting for the simple reason that who in the merry hell would ever use this as a search term?  It'd be a horribly implausible redirect.  Nha Trang  Allons! 11:58, 6 July 2015 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Davewild (talk) 19:57, 6 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Merge to Times Celebex: Bollywood Stars' Rating. (Note: The lists of actors for 2013 and 2014, and actresses for 2014, have already been merged to the same target.) Kraxler (talk) 14:26, 12 July 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.