Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of objects in Artemis Fowl


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. —  Aitias  // discussion 11:30, 21 January 2009 (UTC)

List of objects in Artemis Fowl

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Unreferenced list of nonnotable objects in Artemis Fowl. I see no potential for expansion, as this topic is not covered in third party sources - in other words, it's not notable. Bsimmons 666  (talk) 00:22, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
 * I found the policy I was too tired to search for last night: WP:INDISCRIMINATE. Bsimmons 666  (talk) 14:58, 17 January 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete. Pointless listing of fictional objects. Doctorfluffy (robe and wizard hat) 00:52, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
 * delete per uncategorizable nonesense. What's next, "List of verbs used in Lord of the Rings?"Bali ultimate (talk) 00:58, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete seriously? Tavix (talk) 01:48, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions.   -- • Gene93k (talk) 02:32, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions.   -- • Gene93k (talk) 02:32, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete - WP:LISTCRUFT from some of my favourite books. Beeswaxcandle (talk) 05:10, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete - truly non-notable cruft. Calvin 1998 (t·c) 06:20, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. The indivudual items may be notable (I only read two books and forgot most of what was in it). There's no inclusion criteria, and no way of expanding this beyond a random list of objects. They're better covered in the relevant book articles. (Is that movie still coming?) - Mgm|(talk) 14:05, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete, no place in an encylopedia. Brownsnout spookfish (talk) 15:37, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Unnecessary, does not belong in Wikipedia. Icy  // ♫ 20:33, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete fails WP:INDISCRIMINATE per nom, WP:RS and WP:NOTE. --Patar knight - chat/contributions 20:49, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete per above. Fails WP:IINFO and WP:N. Themfromspace (talk) 23:25, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete I saw your comments, so I agreed to them (and saw the guidelines) but Wikipedia might not have 'List of verbs used in Lord of the Rings' unless it goes and starts having an article about everything. --Leolisa1997 (talk) 13:07, 19 January 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.