Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of obscure or inaccessible London attractions

 This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete.

Note: The recommendations to transwiki to WikiTravel had to be discounted. WikiTravel is not a MediaWiki project and is not GFDL-compatible. Rossami (talk) 21:01, 15 July 2005 (UTC)

List of obscure or inaccessible London attractions
This page has been around for a while and its inadequacies have been pointed out on its talk page. It is arbitary and some of the items chosen do not even fit the title. I could produce half a dozen lists this length that would match the title better, but I wouldn't post them on Wikipedia. We have a full list of London museums and a London attractions category. Merging is not appropriate because the London article already contains too many lists and it would do nothing to address the arbitary nature of this one. So delete CalJW 6 July 2005 20:01 (UTC)
 * Delete, ridiculous classification scheme. Either include them in List of places in London, or if they're not notable enough to be there, leave them out altogether.  Dcarrano July 6, 2005 23:42 (UTC)
 * Delete silly, unencyc list. Also POV. -Splash 7 July 2005 00:25 (UTC)
 * Merge anything useful in List of places in London. - Mgm|(talk) July 7, 2005 08:19 (UTC)
 * They're either there already or are covered under localitities or in specialised lists. The attractions lists in the main List of places in London are deliberately selective. CalJW 7 July 2005 13:56 (UTC)
 * Transwiki to wikitravel. Pburka 9 July 2005 17:29 (UTC)
 * Delete but if Wikitravel wants it, it can have it. How on earth is the British Library on the list? It's one of the biggest buildings in London, right next to three mainline railway stations on one of the main roads, and it's open seven days a week and listed in all the guide books. David | Talk 9 July 2005 17:33 (UTC)
 * Delete per reasons already noted. But the title seems like it belongs in BJAODN.  inaccessible attractions???  The Literate Engineer 08:14, 10 July 2005 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.