Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of oil-rich countries


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete.  Sango 123  00:15, 4 August 2006 (UTC)

List of oil-rich countries
This page is a NPOV nightmare because of the term "oil rich". It also violates the tenet that Wikipedia is not a place for indiscriminate information in part and in part is duplicative of the much better chart of oil reserves in oil reserves. I don't even think a redirect is warranted. Erechtheus 01:34, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Merge and delete per nom--Jusjih 02:02, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete More unnecessary listcruffage. — NM  Chico  24  [[Image:Flag of New Mexico.svg|25px]] 02:24, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom.--Mertens21 a.k.a. FrodoTBagins, DonkeyPunch21, Squirrel 05:19, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. --Hyphen5 05:42, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom.  ''Em-jay-es  07:17, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Per nom. rootology 08:20, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Michael 08:28, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Jacqui ★ 14:29, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete - Jusjih is correct, the Oil reserves article contains all this material. Let's make this a redirect and be done with it.  Williamborg (Bill) 14:47, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Oil reserves, otherwise delete as unnecessary, POV, and redundant. --Core des at talk. ^_^ 15:41, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Redirect or delete per Coredesat. >< Richard 06  12  '''UW 15:58, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as per nom. --MCB 20:58, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete: listcruft Acyso 21:15, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.