Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of one-off characters on South Park


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Keep. —Quarl (talk) 2007-04-28 07:47Z

List of one-off characters on South Park

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Contested prod. The prod listed the following reason: ''Page is full of non-notable characters that are covered perfectly fine on the single episodes. '' Dr bab 14:15, 24 April 2007 (UTC) (The article was prodded by User: TTN)
 * Delete I must say I agree with the original prod on this one, all the information seems to be redundant to the individual epsiode articles. Note that there are a couple of redirect pages that redirect here, if this page is deleted, they should instead redirect to the correct individual episode page. Dr bab 14:26, 24 April 2007 (UTC)


 * Half-hearted Keep. I'd like to see the level of detail in the individual episodes bulked up enough to make this page unnecessary, but as a  resource in the South Park Wikiproject's effort to improve Wikipedia articles related to South Park it does have some value.  Captain Infinity 00:33, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep This page has already been around for quite some time and has a sizable amount of relevent information. Most episode have very little information on the characters themselves that were featured and this gives people the opportunity to add such information that regularly gets deleted out of the episode pages. - Count23 03:16, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep This page has info on single-episode characters not discussed in the episode articles and is good for reference. (On a side note, I contributed several images to this page & deleating it seems like a waste) --Frinko 03:40, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep - All characters appear notable, article justifies its self in length, etc... perfectly legitimate... not to mention the moot deletion reason (how is it nn?) Matthew 14:23, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep. Good stuff, major notable series. Wikipedia not paper. AndyJones 19:44, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep. TTN doesn't like characters that aren't "notable" enough for him, and therefore either proposes a deleting or a merger. I am very much against this as I believe all articles that are well-written and notable enough deserve to be kept. What TTN is doing is vandalism! The Prince of Darkness 20:40, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Strong, speedy keep. It is very useful, and I saw absolutely NO reason to delete it. --98E 20:52, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep. Interesting and complete stuff. DeansFA 13:57, 27 April 2007 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletions.  -- Pax:Vobiscum 16:14, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete These are minor characters and do not require comprehensive coverage, nor can it be achieved because there won't be enough reliable sources. A one sentence mention in the episode article is more than enough. Jay32183 20:03, 27 April 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.