Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of online puzzles


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 08:24, 2 October 2006 (UTC)

List of online puzzles
If this was formatted like a conventional video game list, it would be entirely redlinks (bar one game). As it stands, it is a collection of external links and a forum for self-promotion/advertising. Prod was removed by an anonymous user with the comment: (Removed the removal request as this is a valid resource to illustrate the meaning of an online riddle or puzzle.) Marasmusine 06:44, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete: WP:NOT a directory, a list of game reviews, or a place to promote yourself (and your friends). An interesting page however. --Daniel Olsen 06:57, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. This belongs to DMOZ or similar services. Pavel Vozenilek 11:37, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom Nigel (Talk) 12:31, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Just a list of links.  Peter O. (Talk) 23:20, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Don't Delete. A brilliant list of links, if you fall in love with one of the games, it is an excelent page to refer you to similar pages.  User:AoOs
 * But that's the function of a directory, not an encyclopedia. Marasmusine 19:35, 30 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Don't Delete. First this list was part of the Online_puzzles article and same discussion was held there. Then it was moved to this list of links and now the hole discussion gets repeated. I think the article Online_puzzles would be useless at all without a linklist. If this list is deleted all the riddles will start there own articles on Wikipedia again (that is how it started some years ago). But I must admit that a lot of the links are not worth to be mentioned here. Soulmanager
 * Delete per nom. Directories belong elsewhere. --Ghewgill 10:18, 1 October 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.