Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of paintball scenario teams


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. Chaser - T 11:11, 17 March 2007 (UTC)

List of paintball scenario teams

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

A completely useless, unencyclopedic, unverifiable list. The teams listed here are not notable. I was the one who originally seperated this article from List of professional paintball teams to avoid debating and arguments. — Preceding unsigned comment added by RavenStorm (talk • contribs)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletions.   -- SkierRMH 04:23, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete as either wp:csd or wp:csd. (Valid G7 because the content has not changed substantially since creation and the creator is now requesting deletion, and valid A7 because there is no assertion of notability for any of these teams.  Pan Dan 00:07, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Wikipedia articles are not mere collections of external links. Pax:Vobiscum 09:36, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Notable as the list is in context. Ranking is not applicable to the genre but participation is an essertion of merit.  Teams should be listed if able to prove active play in last six months at a large scale event.  Outlaw rec ball does not a scenario team make. {Karpet}  20:07, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
 * I don't exactly see what you're trying to say. Yes, it may be acceptable in Wikipedia as a list, but how do you determine which teams to include and which not to? I could start a paintball scenario tomorrow and play a few tournament games, that means I'm worth being mentioned in Wikipedia? There is no reasonable standard of notability... as I mentioned above, this list was seperated from an actually notable article, list of professional paintball teams, to avoid controversy. I guess I should've proposed it's entire deletion instead of just moving this list; my bad. RavenStorm 01:57, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Wikipedia is not a directory. Please don't shoot me. Noroton 22:19, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Which method of execution would you prefer? ;)  -- Black Falcon 03:53, 17 March 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete per WP:NOT. Claiming that this is a "list of notable X" is not enough.  The list has to prove that the persons/groups on it are notable. -- Black Falcon 03:53, 17 March 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.