Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of parish priests of Ciruelos


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. postdlf (talk) 22:50, 29 September 2015 (UTC)

List of parish priests of Ciruelos

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Lack significant coverage. Sietecolores (talk) 05:25, 23 September 2015 (UTC)
 * This is plain stupid. The parish of Ciruelos is one of the oldest of Chile, and the list, obviously notable per se. There is plenty of literature on the Parish, did you even try searching on Google? Keep --Diego Grez-Cañete (talk) 14:21, 23 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Chile-related deletion discussions. North America1000 23:03, 23 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. North America1000 23:03, 23 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists of people-related deletion discussions. North America1000 23:03, 23 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Comment. No there is is not any significant coverage. Most of the web content I have found so far is blogs and tourism websites. Diego, please indicate how coverage is significant. Sietecolores (talk) 04:45, 24 September 2015 (UTC)


 * delete Ciruelos is a very small village, and I cannot find notability either for it or for it's parish church.E.M.Gregory (talk) 15:08, 24 September 2015 (UTC)
 * E.M.Gregory: Please note that the parish of Ciruelos comprised, at least until the creation of the commune of Pichilemu in 1894, the territories of the current communes of Peralillo, Paredones, Litueche, Pumanque, Peralillo and Marchigüe (once named Trinidad -Peralillo and Marchigüe-, San Antonio -Pichilemu, and parts of Litueche and Pumanque-, and Cáhuil -southern part of Pichilemu, and Paredones-. Diego Grez-Cañete (talk) 23:52, 24 September 2015 (UTC)
 * User:Diego Grez-Cañete The proper approach is to expand both this article and the article about Ciruelos with well sourced information demonstrating that the priests, parish and village were and/or are significant, noteworthy, important in the world beyond the parish. I looked for such significance, but could not find it.E.M.Gregory (talk)
 * I understand it is troublesome to find sources related to the history of the whole area of Cardenal Caro (province). Very few books have been published on the topic (i.e. Pichilemu: mis fuentes (1990) by Antonio Saldías, Historia urbana de Pichilemu (1996) by Juan Mella, and De campesino a cardenal (1966) by Alberto Arraño, the latter, rather the biography of Cardinal José María Caro, but still, provides some good information). I do have copies of the three books, but unfortunately have no time to expand the articles detailing such thing. I am going to publish a book, in December, that contains a lot of info about Ciruelos and the parish, but I cannot include it now since it would count as original research. Diego Grez-Cañete (talk) 00:11, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
 * By the way, if there is anybody interested in expanding or modifying this article and the one about Ciruelos, I may provide (privately) a PDF copy of the books I cited. Diego Grez-Cañete (talk) 00:12, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete. Village priests don't rate a list. Clarityfiend (talk) 23:41, 24 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete -- The fact that not one of the priests has a blue link to an article suggests that they are all NN; in which case the list is also NN. Peterkingiron (talk) 16:07, 27 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete - list cruft. Carrite (talk) 15:45, 28 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete per . We are not a web host for lists.  Even if the parish is notable, its priests might not be.  Normally, only bishops, saints, and monsignors would be considered notable. Bearian (talk) 21:21, 29 September 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.