Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of parties inspired by Project X


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. The Bushranger One ping only 02:19, 4 August 2012 (UTC)

List of parties inspired by Project X

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

Non notable subject. User continues to push it while concealing their own agenda for this "Project OBX" thing, such that the article has a subsection purely for it. It is an unnotable subject about matters barely notable in the parent article, but user refuses to discuss or reason. Needs deleting not only because it is inappropriate but to prevent misuse. Darkwarriorblake (talk) 20:43, 28 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep It surley is notable as the events appear on the news and cause lots of damage and arrests, even death.--71.80.53.52 (talk) 13:50, 29 July 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete. Subject is not notable in its own right, inappropriate and adequately covered at the parent article.  And yes, there are agenda issues also. --Rob Sinden (talk) 07:59, 30 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete Textual portion is duplicated from Project X (2012 film). Table doesn't have references, and some of it is obviously non-notable, so it's unclear if any of it should be saved.  No reason for this to exist as a separate article. --Colapeninsula (talk) 11:51, 30 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete as nonsense. What's this about the Arab Spring? --BDD (talk) 16:48, 30 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 03:32, 31 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 03:32, 31 July 2012 (UTC)


 * Additional comment. The (now) redirect ProjectOBX should probably also be removed, as it was dubiously created at the same time.  --Rob Sinden (talk) 10:24, 31 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Speedy KeepThis is carazy that this article is even being considered for deletion, obviously meets all or most requirements, especially notability.--71.87.155.30 (talk) 14:16, 2 August 2012 (UTC) — 71.87.155.30 (talk) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
 * Delete - Look under Project X's Legacy section, no need for merge. This article has 'example' and TBA/TBD for entries as if Wikipedia is a social relay of future plans for these parties. ChrisGualtieri (talk) 06:47, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.